Poland
Poland performs in the mid-range across all four categories of the Global State of Democracy (GSoD) framework, and is in the top 25 per cent globally in most factors. Comparing 2024 to 2019, Poland experienced significant advances in Effective Parliament, Predictable Enforcement and Civil Liberties (including Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Expression), with no significant declines. Recent steps towards democratic reform have included measures to hold officials accountable for corruption, and to safeguard the independence of judges and prosecutors, as well as the state media. Poland boasts a high-income economy with dynamic automotive, aerospace, information technology (IT), pharmaceutical and financial services sectors. After decades of outmigration, there are signs that recent economic growth, and particularly a vibrant IT sector, is attracting members of the Polish diaspora to return.
Poland was united in a centralized state under Mieszko I in the 10th century, yet its borders continued to evolve. The territory was partitioned by Russia, Prussia and Austria at the end of the 18th century, before Poland regained independence at the end of World War I. A history of trauma, rooted in the experiences of World War II and decades as a satellite state of the Soviet Union, has left an enduring legacy. This has often been used by politicians to stir up nationalist sentiments.
Poland transitioned to democracy in 1989 after the fall of communism. Accession to the European Union in 2004 sparked continuing debates around national versus European identity, as well as EU membership and national sovereignty. In 2024, as the government outlined plans for a sweeping judicial overhaul, the European Commission announced the end of a protracted dispute during which it had suspended funding to Poland citing weak judicial independence. The Polish government is also pursuing accountability for previous misuse of the Justice Ministry’s resources.
Poland is home to sizeable Silesian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, and German minority communities. As immigration has risen over the past decade, domestic and international human rights groups and NGOs have criticized authorities for committing violent ‘pushbacks’ and decriminalizing the use of weapons in border management. Both the government and opposition agree that the latter is justified by allegations that Belarusian authorities are encouraging migrants to cross the border to destabilize Poland.
Poland performs at the boundary of the high range in Gender Equality, after having dropped to mid-range performance between 2021 and 2022. In 2024, government guidelines sought to ease access to abortion, but legislative proposals have faced delays. The government has also taken steps to reverse years of stigmatization of the LGBTQIA+ community. In 2025, a Supreme Court resolution simplified the legal procedure for gender recognition, and local authorities reversed ‘family values’ charters adopted between 2019-2020.
Looking ahead, it will be important to watch Rule of Law, including efforts to advance judicial reforms. Recent attempts to legally recognize same-sex partnerships and to broaden hate speech protections should be monitored for impacts on Social Group Equality. Progress on these legislative proposals will be contingent on collaboration between the government and the opposition-backed president elected in June 2025. Finally, it will be important to monitor legislation allowing the temporary suspension of asylum rights at the border with Belarus for impacts on Civil Liberties and Predictable Enforcement.
Last updated: August 2025
https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/
April 2026
Legal uncertainty escalates over Constitutional Tribunal appointments
On 1 April, President Karol Nawrocki swore in two judges elected by parliament but refused to administer the oath to four others. In response, on 9 April, Parliament hosted a controversial ceremony to swear in the remaining judges, effectively bypassing the president’s role in the formal appointment process. Since late 2025, vacancies on the court have reduced its staffing below the legally required quorum, after one judge’s term expired and another retired. Parliament elected these six new judges in March 2026 in an attempt to restore the court’s functioning. The President and the TK Chief Justice have rejected the parliamentary ceremony as invalid. The dispute threatens to call into question the validity of future rulings and deepens the legal uncertainty around the court. The European Court of Human Rights issued interim measures in May requiring that the four judges be allowed to take up their duties. In parallel, the TK is reviewing the constitutionality of their appointment.
Sources: ConstitutionNet, Notes from Poland (1), Notes from Poland (2), Notes from Poland (3), Notes from Poland (4), European Court of Human Rights
September 2025
CJEU enables domestic courts to nullify Supreme Court chamber rulings
On 4 September, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that decisions by Poland’s Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, created by the former Law and Justice (PiS) government, must be treated as null and void. This allows domestic courts to disregard cases referred back by the chamber, meaning the lower court’s original judgment stands. The CJEU had already found that the chamber lacked independence due to flawed appointments in 2023. While the CJEU ruling reinforces standards for judicial independence, it creates temporary legal uncertainty about appeal pathways and institutional responsibilities, and risks creating gaps in judicial oversight and election certification. The judgment gives a firmer legal foundation to the government’s stance that rulings of the chamber that do not meet EU law standards should be disregarded. Plans to abolish the chamber were included as part of the 2024 Ministry of Justice action plan to restore judicial independence.
Sources: Verfassungsblog (1), Verfassungsblog (2), CURIA, Notes from Poland, Polish Government
July 2025
Doctors convicted after pregnant woman’s death sparks calls for abortion reform
On 17 July, the District Court in Pszczyna convicted three doctors of endangering a patient’s life after a pregnant woman died in hospital under their care in 2021. The case represents one of the first convictions of a medical professional in connection to the denial of abortion access since a 2020 Constitutional Court ruling made abortions due to birth defects illegal. The doctors had delayed the needed interventions after the woman suffered a premature membrane rupture, deciding to wait until the fetus—which had abnormalities—died. Local NGO FEDERA noted that doctors may be hesitant to provide abortion care due to fears of being prosecuted. The incident sparked nationwide protests against Poland’s restrictive abortion laws. All three doctors received professional bans ranging between four and six years; two received prison sentences between 15 and 18 months and the third received a suspended sentence. The verdict can be appealed.
Sources: Notes from Poland (1), Notes from Poland (2), BBC, FEDERA, Human Rights Watch, PAP
May 2025
Opposition-backed candidate wins polarized presidential election
On 1 June, Karol Nawrocki, an independent candidate supported by the Law and Justice party (PiS) narrowly won the second round of Poland’s presidential election with 50.9 per cent of the vote. Rafał Trzaskowski, member of the incumbent Civic Platform party and mayor of Warsaw, received 49.1 per cent of the vote. The National Electoral Commission reported voter turnout of 71.6 per cent, up from 68.2 per cent turnout in the 2020 presidential election. Voter turnout in the first round of the election held on 18 May was 67.3 per cent. There were 13 presidential candidates in the first round, including 2 women and 11 men. Observers considered the election competitive and well managed, while noting a polarized media environment limiting voters’ access to impartial information.
Sources: Al Jazeera, National Electoral Commission Poland, International IDEA, Organzation for Security and Co-operation in Europe
See all event reports for this country
Global ranking per category of democratic performance in 2025
Basic Information
Human Rights Treaties
Performance by category over the last 6 months
Blogs
Global State of Democracy Indices
Hover over the trend lines to see the exact data points across the years
Factors of Democratic Performance Over Time
Use the slider below to see how democratic performance has changed over time