Nepal
Nepal exhibits mid-range performance across all four categories of the Global State of Democracy Framework, with relatively higher performance in Representation. It is among the top 25 per cent of countries in Free Political Parties, Local Democracy and Civic Engagement. Nepal’s lower middle-income economy relies on agriculture and a growing services sector. Remittances from its sizable migrant population comprise about 25 per cent of the nation’s GDP.
The hierarchical segmentation of Nepali society along the lines of the Hindu caste system led to the historical and systematic exclusion of women, Dalits, Janajatis, Madhesis and Muslims. These ‘traditionally marginalized groups’ have been central to Nepal’s political discourse since the mid-20th century and their aspiration for inclusive government and development have driven pivotal moments in Nepali history. Long an absolute monarchy, Nepal saw a non-violent democratic movement in 1990, led by the then-banned mainstream political parties under the Panchayat system, which successfully pushed for a transition to a constitutional monarchy. Between 1996 and 2006, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) launched an armed insurgency seeking to abolish the monarchy and establish a republic. This decade-long armed conflictended with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and paved the way for elections to the Constituent Assembly. In September 2015, a new constitution was promulgated, which recognized Nepal as a secular, inclusive, multi-ethnic, and federal country. In 2017, the political transition that had begun more than a decade earlier concluded with elections to the three layers of government (federal, provincial, and local) under the newly created federal system.
Despite major political shifts, social norms, institutional structures, and political parties have hindered the integration of traditionally marginalized populations in politics. Moreover, the larger peace process remains unfinished as successive governments have neglected to address wartime human rights violations and the Commission of Investigation on Enforced Disappeared Persons, established in 2015, has made little progress. In August 2024, parliament passed a e new law ,bringing new appointments to Nepal’s two transnational justice bodies – the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission of Investigation on Enforced Disappeared Persons - offering a chance to advance stalled efforts.
Since the 2022 elections, Nepal has experienced continued political instability, marked by frequent coalition changes which continue to hamper meaningful political reform. The central government has also been slow to devolve power and resources to provinces and local governments, which continue to face capacity constraints, limited autonomy, and administrative challenges. This has undermined the effectiveness of subnational governance.
Nepal has made notable progress over the last two decades in Gender Equality, particularly in women’s political participation. However, although the Constitution guarantees equal rights for every citizen and prohibits gender-based discrimination, the Citizenship Act remains discriminatory against women. Structural inequalities and violence also continue to hinder Nepal’s attainment of gender equality. Moreover, systemic caste-based discrimination has made access to justice for Dalit women and girls elusive. In June 2023, Nepal became the first country in South Asia to order legal registration of same-sex marriages, with legislation still pending.
Looking ahead, Representation will be an area to watch, in light of shifting coalition politics and ongoing discussions about constitutional and electoral reforms. Additionally, Civil Liberties will need monitoring concerning proposed legislation on social media and the press.
Last Updated: June 2025
https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/
July 2025
Nepal bans popular messaging platform Telegram
On 18 July, the Nepal Telecommunications Authority instructed internet providers to restrict access to the platform Telegram, citing online fraud and money laundering concerns. The ban follows a previous move to block TikTok in 2023, which was later lifted in 2024, and occurs against the backdrop of the controversial Social Media Act Bill being considered in parliament which would strictly regulate social media platforms. Digital rights experts have criticized the ban, calling it an ’illegal and disproportionate measure’ that undermines freedom of expression and digital privacy. They argue that the decision to block the app is discriminatory and lacks transparency.
Sources: Access Now, The Kathmandu Post, Channel News Asia
June 2025
Electronic Transaction Act used to target journalist in cybercrime case
In June, Nepali police attempted to arrest prominent journalist Dil Bhushan Pathak for reporting on a government official's family business dealings overseas on his YouTube channel. The Kathmandu District Court issued an arrest warrant on 11 June under the Electronic Transaction Act, which is intended to regulate online transactions and combat money laundering. However, it has often been used to suppress online dissent. Although the Patan High Court blocked the arrest on 16 June, the police ignored the order and summoned Pathak the following day. On the same day the arrest warrant was issued, the Kathmandu District Court ordered two news outlets to remove content related to separate business dealings from another official under the same Act. Press freedom advocates warn that this situation illustrates a growing pattern of legal harassment and the misuse of laws to silence dissent.
Sources: IFJ, Human Rights Watch, Nepali Times, The Kathmandu Post (1) The Kathmandu Post (2)
May 2025
Transitional justice commission appointments face scrutiny
On 14 May 2025, the government appointed 10 officials to lead the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission of Investigation on Enforced Disappeared Persons, aimed at addressing human rights abuses committed during the 1996-2006 armed conflict. Despite being established nearly a decade ago, the bodies were without leadership for the past two years. The government’s passage of the transitional justice law in 2024 allowed for new leadership appointments to be made. However, rights groups and victims have criticized the selection process for being politically influenced and lacking transparency, with no public consultation. Conflict victims have urged the government to correct the flawed process or risk undermining the justice effort altogether. Although no direct response to these concerns have been given, officials have expressed that they are committed to ensuring justice for victims and urged citizens to trust in the process and commissioners.
Sources: International IDEA, The Kathmandu Post (1), The Kathmandu Post (2), Human Rights Watch, The Kathmandu Post (3)
March 2025
Pro-monarchy protests turn violent
On 28 March, protests demanding the restoration of the monarchy turned violent, resulting in at least two deaths and over 112 injured. While calls to reinstate the monarchy in Nepal are not new, these clashes were the most severe since 2015. Political analysts noted that various motivations fuelled the protests. Although support for the monarchy remains limited, the protests reflect widespread public dissatisfaction with governance and political instability. In response, the government imposed a curfew and deployed the military to restore order. Several protest leaders were arrested on charges of instigating violence. Political experts have criticized security officials for being unprepared and failing to contain the unrest. It remains unclear as to who is responsible for the deadly violence, with a government investigation ongoing.
Sources: The Kathmandu Post, New York Times, The Annapurna Express, The Diplomat, Frontline Magazine
See all event reports for this country
Global ranking per category of democratic performance in 2024
Basic Information
Human Rights Treaties
State party
Signatory
No action
Performance by category over the last 6 months
Global State of Democracy Indices
Hover over the trend lines to see the exact data points across the years
Factors of Democratic Performance Over Time
Use the slider below to see how democratic performance has changed over time
