
Palestine

Palestine performs in the mid-range in the Participation and Rights categories of the Global State of Democracy framework, while scoring low in Representation and Rule of Law. It falls among the bottom 25 per cent of countries in a majority of factors of the framework. Compared to five years prior, Palestine has seen significant declines in Access to Justice, Civil Liberties, Judicial Independence, Predictable Enforcement and Civil Society. It has a heavily aid-dependent economy, with high poverty and unemployment rates. Israeli control of Palestinian Authority tax revenues, land, resources, and movement restricts market access and jobs, straining the economy.
Palestine is comprised of two geographically separated areas of land, the West Bank and Gaza Strip; the GSoD Indices data cover only the West Bank.
Palestine has never existed as a fully realized nation-state, as foreign powers have for centuries been the dominant sovereign authority. In 1948, despite rejection by Arab states, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181, which created the State of Israel on 77 per cent of Palestinian land. Palestinians faced mass expulsion and ethnic cleansing (Nakba). Subsequent Arab-Israeli wars led to the displacement of millions of Palestinians, resulting in a large refugee population.
Today, around 60 per cent of Palestinian territories remain under full Israeli control. These areas are particularly subject to constant military presence, frequent arrests and detentions, ongoing violence, severe movement restrictions, and widespread destruction of Palestinian property. In this context, the quest for independent statehood and redress for historical injustices continues to be a central driving force in Palestinian politics. Yet, the state on offer to Palestine has been rapidly diminishing due to the expansion of Israel’s colonial settlement project and the persistent occupation, factors that which profoundly impact every aspect of Palestinian life.
Palestinian politics are divided between two main factions: Fatah and Hamas. Fatah is a secular nationalist party that leads the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), a coalition of political parties formed in the 1960s to represent Palestinians at international fora. Domestically, it controls the Palestinian Authority, a limited self-governing body created in 1994 by the Oslo Accords to govern parts of the West Bank and Gaza. However, since 2007, Gaza has been governed by Hamas, an Islamist group. The split in Palestine’s governance occurred after the 2006 legislative elections, which were won by Hamas but disputed by Fatah. No national elections have been held since.
The political context has been marked by institutional stagnation, including postponed presidential elections, an increasingly strong executive, corruption, and a vast security apparatus used to repress dissent. Since the start of the war in Gaza in 2023, the devastating impacts of the war have also come to the fore, including the destruction of infrastructure, food insecurity, disease, the curtailment of press freedom and forceful displacement of almost the entire population of Gaza.
Palestine scores low on the GSoD’s measure of Gender Equality, with women underrepresented in the labour market and politics. Despite an active civil society advocating for LGBTQIA+ rights, the community faces stigma and violence.
Looking ahead, democratic progress in Palestine depends fundamentally on the cessation of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza and the end of occupation. Once these realities change, other critical issues to watch will include the unification of its governance, the resumption of national elections, and any advancement toward full sovereign statehood.
Last Updated: June 2025
https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/
August 2025
Global hunger monitor declares state of famine in Gaza Governorate
On 22 August, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global standard for assessing food insecurity, announced that its Famine Review Committee (FRC) determined that the Gaza Governorate is experiencing famine. The FRC concluded that this famine, which is the highest level on the IPC’s Acute Food Insecurity scale, is man-made, resulting from the ongoing war in Gaza. The IPC also projected the famine to spread to other areas in Gaza (Deir al- Balah and Khan Younis governorates) by the end of September. An area is classified as experiencing famine when there is clear evidence that at least two of the three key thresholds (starvation, acute malnutrition, and mortality), have been met, and broader evidence strongly suggests that the third threshold has likely been reached. This marks the fifth time the IPC has made such a determination since its establishment in 2004.
Sources: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, Palestinian News and Information Agency, Reuters
June 2025
Shootings at Israeli-controlled food distribution sites kill over 600 Palestinians
In June, at least 600 Palestinians were killed and thousands more injured in repeated shootings near food distribution sites in Gaza operated by the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF, launched in late May with support from Israel and the United States, has been criticized for operating under Israeli military oversight. Throughout the month, Palestinians attempting to reach aid at GHF sites, where Israeli forces and armed U.S. contractors were present, were shot at on multiple days and in various locations. On 16 June alone, more than 34 people were killed. Human rights organizations have condemned the GHF's aid model as unsafe and dehumanizing, while United Nations officials have stated that aid distribution in Gaza has become a ‘death trap.’
*Since the impact of these events are felt primarily in Palestine, they are coded in the entries for the latter. While they are not coded for Israel, it is Israeli action that causes the effects on democracy in Palestine.
Sources: Haaretz, France24, The Guardian, Reuters, Middle East Eye, Al Jazeera
March 2025
Israel breaks ceasefire with strikes and new ground invasion of Gaza
In March, Israel violated the Gaza ceasefire agreement it had previously reached with Hamas, which had been in place since 19 January, by launching airstrikes and initiating a ground invasion of Gaza. After reimposing a full siege on Gaza on 2 March, blocking all humanitarian aid, the Israeli military launched a new wave of airstrikes across the Strip on 18 March. The following day, Israeli forces retook control of the Netzarim Corridor, cutting off north-south movement within Gaza. On 20 March, a new ground invasion was launched in the north. By the end of the month, more than 1,000 Palestinians had been killed since the strikes resumed. The violence also caused widespread displacement, with new evacuation orders issued by Israel throughout Gaza, including in the southern city of Rafah on 31 March, forcing thousands to flee.
*Since the impact of these events are felt primarily in Palestine, they are coded in the entries for the latter. While they are not coded for Israel, it is Israeli action that causes the effects on democracy in Palestine.
Sources: Associated Press (1), Associated Press (2), Haaretz (1), United Nations, Middle East Eye, Haaretz (2)
New Israeli body to promote ‘voluntary’ Palestinian emigration from Gaza
On 22 March, Israel’s Security Cabinet approved the establishment of a directorate within the Ministry of Defense to oversee the ‘voluntary departure’ of Palestinians from Gaza to third countries. The directorate’s mandate includes organizing safe and controlled passage, securing transit routes, conducting screenings at designated crossings, and coordinating infrastructure for land, sea, and air travel to third countries. While Israeli officials portray the initiative as ‘humanitarian’, observers warn that, if implemented, it would result in the mass displacement of Palestinians from Gaza. To date, no third countries have publicly agreed to accept Palestinians from Gaza. However, media reports indicate that Israel and the United States discussed plans with at least three East African governments.
*Since the impact of these events are felt primarily in Palestine, they are coded in the entries for the latter. While they are not coded for Israel, it is Israeli action that causes the effects on democracy in Palestine.
Sources: The Times of Israel (1), Haaretz, The Times of Israel (2), Associated Press
January 2025
Gaza ceasefire reached between Israel and Hamas
On 19 January, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas took effect, potentially ending 15 months of war in Gaza. The first phase of the agreement, planned to last 42 days, is to involve the release of 33 Israeli hostages in exchange for 1,900 Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli prisons. Israel has also started to withdraw its military forces from populated areas and the Netzarim Corridor in Gaza, allowing displaced Palestinians to return to their homes and facilitating the entry and delivery of humanitarian aid. If successful, a second phase would involve an additional exchange of hostages and prisoners and a full withdrawal of Israeli troops. The third phase would focus on Gaza's reconstruction. The agreement, mediated by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar, showed initial progress by the end of January, but concerns about its stability remain. Details of the second and third phases of the ceasefire are yet to be negotiated.
Sources: Financial Times, WAFA, Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Sada News
40,000 forcibly displaced by Israeli offensive in northern West Bank
On 21 January, Israel launched "Iron Wall," a large-scale military operation in the northern West Bank, which initially targeted Jenin Camp before quickly expanding to the refugee camps of Tulkarm, Nur Shams, and Faraa. In early February, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees reported that the violence has rendered these camps uninhabitable, displacing over 40,000 people (more than half the population of these camps). At least 29 Palestinians were killed, and many more were injured, with homes and civilian infrastructure severely destroyed by airstrikes. Further military raids were also reported in Hebron, Bethlehem, and East Jerusalem. The escalation also saw an increase in attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinian villages, following a decision by the United States to lift sanctions on violent settlers.
*Since the impact of these events are felt primarily in Palestine, they are coded in the entries for the latter. While they are not coded for Israel, it is Israeli action that causes the effects on democracy in Palestine.
Sources: Associated Press, Al Arabiya, Reuters, WAFA, UNRWA
See all event reports for this country
Global ranking per category of democratic performance in 2024
Basic Information
Human Rights Treaties
Performance by category over the last 6 months
Blogs
Global State of Democracy Indices
Hover over the trend lines to see the exact data points across the years
Factors of Democratic Performance Over Time
Use the slider below to see how democratic performance has changed over time