Sudan
Sudan exhibits low-level performance across three of the categories of the Global State of Democracy framework: Representation, Rights and Rule of Law; it falls within the mid-range with regard to Participation. Over the past five years, it has experienced multiple improvements in several factors of Rights, Rule of Law and Participation, which reflect democratic progress following the 2019 coup that deposed Omar al-Bashir. A subsequent military coup in 2021, however, put this transition in peril. Sudan is a low-income country, with an economy primarily based on petroleum exports, agriculture, and gold mining.
In precolonial times, present-day Sudan was inhabited by Nubian kingdoms that had major influences on African and Egyptian art, culture, and religion. Over the course of the 19th century, Sudan came under the joint colonial rule of the UK and Egypt as well as Turkish-Egyptian rule; it gained its independence in 1956. Since then, the country’s political history has been characterized by short periods of democratic rule, several coups and military regimes, long stretches of authoritarian control and war. Omar al-Bashir , wanted for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court, ruled Sudan from 1989 to 2019.
Sudan’s politics have generally been driven by conflicts between center and periphery and between Islamists and secularists. Much of post-independence history has been marked by a civil war with present-day South Sudan, which obtained its independence from Sudan in 2011. This conflict was driven by the diverging demographics of the predominantly Muslim Arab North and the majority Christian and Black South, and by the President’s 1983 decision to impose Sharia law on the entire country. The War in Darfur, ongoing to the present day, similarly reflects the grievances of many in the region who are of non-Arab ethnicity; this conflict has produced gross human rights abuses and atrocities, largely committed by security forces and by Janjaweed militia. Divisions between Islamists and secularists also remain highly salient in Sudan, fueling civil conflicts and fierce debates regarding rights and freedoms. The time between 1983 and 2019, when the country was governed under Sharia law, saw significant curtailment of the rights of women, LGBTQIA+ people, and religious and ethnic minorities.
Issues of development and democracy also drive politics in Sudan. The country ranks poorly in the UN Human Development Index, and the 2019 protests that led to the downfall of President Bashir began in large part due to the end of bread and fuel subsidies and the decline of living standards. About one-third of Sudanese people are faced with hunger and serious food insecurity. The Bashir regime was accused of severe corruption, and efforts to recoup certain assets are ongoing.
Over the coming years, much will depend on whether the country is able to negotiate an end to renewed fighting and a return to civilian government. If this occurs, it will be important to watch any transitional justice mechanisms, the work of the anti-corruption taskforce and the repeal of sharia law. These changes could impact almost all factors of democratic performance.
https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/
August 2024
Famine officially declared in Darfur IDP camp
On 1 August, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global standard for food security, announced that its Famine Review Committee (FRC) had confirmed an ongoing famine in Zamzam camp, an internally displaced persons camp in Darfur. According to the FRC, famine conditions in Zamzam are highly likely to persist beyond October and that other areas of Sudan remain at risk of famine due to the ongoing conflict and limited humanitarian access. Zamzam is thought to be sheltering half a million people and is located on the outskirts of the North Darfurian city of El Fasher, that has for months been besieged by the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary force fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces. For a famine to be declared by the IPC, it has to determine that a sufficiently high proportion of a population in a specific area is suffering from extreme food scarcity. It is only the third time that it has made such a determination since its establishment in 2004.
Sources: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (1), Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (2), Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (3), Famine Early Warning Systems Network
June 2024
UN experts say warring parties using starvation as weapon of war
In a joint statement published on 26 June, six UN Special Rapporteurs said that both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are using starvation as a weapon of war. The use of starvation as a weapon of war is a war crime under international law. According to the experts, the parties, who have been fighting each other since April 2023, are ‘blocking, looting and exploiting humanitarian assistance.’ They referred in particular to the RSF’s ongoing siege of El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur State, where hundreds of thousands of civilians remain trapped and are ‘suffering from severe hunger and thirst’. The experts also criticised the arrest, threatening and prosecution of activists and volunteers, whose community mutual aid initiatives, they said, are ‘currently leading food delivery efforts’. A June report from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification found that Sudan is facing its worst recorded levels of food insecurity and the UN experts warned that ‘widespread famine [is] imminent’.
Sources: United Nations, International Committee of the Red Cross, Just Security, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification
May 2024
Intensified fighting in North Dafur’s capital prompts genocide warnings
An intensification of fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in el-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, has prompted a UN expert to warn of genocide. El-Fasher, the last major urban area in Darfur controlled by the SAF, has been besieged by the RSF since April 2024. However, by May the security situation had significantly deteriorated, leaving the more-than one million people thought to be trapped in the city at risk of dying from a lack of food and medicine, being caught in the crossfire or becoming the targets of ethnic violence. Experts have warned that the fighting threatens to aggravate intercommunal conflict, predicting that the increasingly polarised environment could lead to large-scale ethnic killings. Among them was the UN’s Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, who in a UN Security Council briefing on 21 May stated that the risk of genocide in Sudan was ‘growing, every single day’.
Sources: The New Humanitarian, Middle East Eye (1), Middle East Eye (2), Sudan Tribune, United Nations (1), United Nations (2), British Broadcasting Corporation
April 2024
Sudan suspends UAE- and Saudi-owned TV channels
On 2 April, Sudan’s Ministry of Culture and Information suspended the operations of three TV channels in the country, Saudi Arabia’s state-owned Al Arabiya and Al Hadath and the UAE-owned Sky News Arabia. The Ministry justified its decision on the grounds that the outlets had failed to renew their licences and that they had shown ‘a lack of commitment to the required professionalism and transparency.’ The suspensions were heavily criticised by the Sudanese Journalists Syndicate, a trade union, which described them as a ‘clear violation of freedom of expression and freedom of the media’ and asserted that they were part of a broader pattern of journalist intimidation in Sudan, which is in the midst of a civil war.
Sources: Reuters, Sudan Tribune, Sudanese Journalists Syndicate, Committee to Protect Journalists, Radio Dabanga
See all event reports for this country
Global ranking per category of democratic performance in 2023
Basic Information
Human Rights Treaties
State party
Signatory
No action
Performance by category over the last 6 months
Global State of Democracy Indices
Hover over the trend lines to see the exact data points across the years
Factors of Democratic Performance Over Time
Use the slider below to see how democratic performance has changed over time
