How to do an assessment
The State of Democracy Assessment Framework may be applied in any democracy, regardless of its level of economic development. It consists of five main phases, and it can be used as a whole, in part or targeted at specific priority areas.
Pillars and Search Questions
The combination of core principles and mediating values generates a list of questions to be answered during the State of Democracy assessment.
The State of Democracy assessment framework is divided into four thematic pillars, each consisting of two to six sub-themes and several questions that contribute to the guiding questionnaire.
Principles and Mediating Values
A conception of democracy that is anchored in clear democratic principles and mediating values helps provide a framework for high-quality democracy.
Democratic Accountability in Service Delivery
The Assessment Network
People expect their governments to deliver public services in an efficient manner that meets their needs and recognizes their human rights. People expect to be able to raise their concerns and to be listened to. This guide enables users to assess the degree to which public service delivery is subject to democratic accountability checks and, based on that knowledge, identify areas of concrete action for improvement.
State of Local Democracy Assessment Framework
The local level assessment network
The State of Local Democracy (SoLD) Assessment Framework is designed to facilitate a citizen-led and -owned approach to assessing the quality of democracy at the local level.
The SoLD Assessment Framework is a practical resource for citizens to conduct self-assessments of democratic life in their locality, identify democratic strengths and weaknesses, and translate these into reform agendas for further broadening and deepening of their local democracies.
State of Democracy Assessment Framework
The Assessment Framework at the National Level
The State of Democracy Assessment Framework aims to assess the quality of democracy a the national level and can be used as a whole, in part or targeted at specific priority areas.
South Korea
International IDEA implemented a State of Democracy assessment in South Korea as a pilot study in 2002. After 50 years in which South Korea has undergone profound social transformation from being one of the poorest countries in the world to becoming the forerunner of the Newly Industrializing Countries, it emerged how the economic miracle was possible at the expense of democracy and respect for human rights.
Sri Lanka
The State of Democracy assessment in Sri Lanka was part of the region-wide State of Democracy in South Asia report, the only regional report to date produced with the cooperation of experts from India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. The assessment was led by Professor Jayadeva Uyangoda, head of the Department of Political Science and Public Policy at the University of Colombo.
United Kingdom
The democracy assessment in the United Kingdom has been the forerunner of the current International IDEA methodology for democracy assessments. When the idea arose to systematically assess the UK's democracy in the 1980s, the UK Democratic Audit developed a methodology and the first assessment took place in 1992. International IDEA then proposed redesigning and expanding the original framework in order to create a universal tool for assessing the quality of democracy worldwide, which became the State of Democracy Assessment Framework.
