Unravelling Parliamentary Instability: Ministerial Durations in Papua New Guinea, 1972–2012

This publication is only available in electronic format
Published: 
13 December 2016
Language: 
English
Pages: 
32
Author(s): 
Henry Ivarature

This Discussion Paper examines political instability in Papua New Guinea (PNG) by tracking the country’s changes of government and discussing both the constitutional amendments made to prolong the life of governments and the Supreme Court’s responses to these amendments. It also discusses the importance of ministerial tenure for government continuity and effective public administration.

To date, discussion and analysis in PNG has focused on changes in government instead of changes in ministers, which has escaped the purview of reforms on parliamentary instability. The degree of ministers’ ‘continuity’, namely the appointment of individual ministers from a collapsed government to the next government under a new PM, is also discussed.

The analysis suggests that parliamentary instability is a complex issue, and that reforms to improve parliamentary instability should be evidence-based and supported by research. The limited durations of ministers in PNG over the 40-year period covered here highlights this factor as a potent challenge to good governance and effective public administration.

Contents

Acknowledgements        

Executive summary                    

1. Introduction  

2. Changes of governments in Papua New Guinea              

3. Papua New Guinea’s national government                     

4. Amending the Constitution to prolong the life of governments, and Supreme Court responses

5. The ‘Integrity law’ seeks to keep parties together             

6. The concept of ministerial tenure                      

7. Contextualizing ministerial tenure in Papua New Guinea              

8. Ministerial tenure in Papua New Guinea, 1972–2012                   

Conclusions and policy recommendations              

References                                

About the author                       

About International IDEA                      

More International IDEA Discussion Papers

Related Content

Jul
21
2017
Photo credit: airpix - 2017

Photo credit: airpix - 2017

Feature Story
Jul
21
2017
Representatives of International IDEA Member States met in Brussels on 10 July 2017. Photo: Gosia Calabro | International IDEA

Representatives of International IDEA Member States met in Brussels on 10 July 2017. Photo: Gosia Calabro | International IDEA

News Article
Jul
20
2017
The conference was a joint effort between International IDEA, the European Union and the Joint Public Accounts Committee of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.  Photo: Giles Dickenson-Jones.

The conference was a joint effort between International IDEA, the European Union and the Joint Public Accounts Committee of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. Photo: Giles Dickenson-Jones.

News Article
Jul
11
2017
Left to right:  Malin Stjernström, Swedish Development Forum Helena Bjuremalm, International IDEA Alexandra Wilde, UNDP Oslo Governance Center Massimo Tommasoli, International IDEA Photo: David Rosén  International IDEA

From left to right:  Malin Stjernström (Swedish Development Forum), Helena Bjuremalm (International IDEA), Alexandra Wilde (UNDP Oslo Governance Center) and Massimo Tommasoli (International IDEA)

Photo credit: David Rosén, International IDEA

News Article