Gender Quotas Database

Country Data

EXPLORE QUOTA DATA    

 

United Kingdom (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

United Kingdom (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) has a Bicameral parliament with the use of voluntary party quotas. 225 of 648 (35%) seats in the House of Commons are held by women.

At a glance

Structure of Parliament: Bicameral

Are there legislated quotas...

  • For the Single/Lower House? No
  • For the Upper House? No
  • For the Sub-National Level? No

Are there voluntary quotas...

  • Adopted by political parties? Yes

Is there additional information?...

  • Yes

Last updated: May 31, 2022

Single/Lower House

House of Commons

Total seats 648
Total Women 225
% Women 35%
Election Year 2019
Electoral System FPTP
Quota Type No legislated
Election details IDEA Voter Turnout - IPU Parline

Upper House

House of Lords

Total seats 776
Total Women 222
% Women 29%
Election Year 2021
Electoral System
Quota Type No legislated>
Election details IPU Parline
  Legal source Details
Quota type: No legislated Electoral law  
Legal sanctions for non-compliance No data available
Rank order/placement rules No data available

Voluntary Political Party Quotas*

Party Official name Details, Quota provisions
Liberal Democrats Article 2.5: "Whenever this Constitution provides for the election by party members to a Federal Committee, not less than 40% or, if 40% is not a whole number, the whole number nearest to but not exceeding 40% of those elected shall selfidentify as men or non-binary people, and self-identify as women or non-binary people respectively" (The Federal Constitution of the Liberal Democrats, 2018).
Labour Party The Labour Party's commitment is that 50% of all winnable parliamentary seats will select from All Women Shortlists.

* Only political parties represented in parliament are included. When a country has legislated quotas in place, only political parties that have voluntary quotas that exceed the percentage/number of the national quota legislation are presented in this table.

Additional Information

Scottish Parliament: In the 1999 election, women were elected to 48 of 129 seats (37.2 percent) in parliament.This increased slightly to 51 women and 39.5 percent in 2003. In the 2007 election 43 women were elected (33.3 percent)

National Assembly for Wales: In the 2003 election 30 of 60 seats went to women (50 percent). In the 2007 election, women were elected to 29 of 60 seats (48.3 percent) in parliament.

With regard to the establishment of the Scottish Parliament, women's groups proposed measures to promote women's representation. The Women's Committee of the Scottish Trade Union Congress proposed a 50/50 gender balance in the new Scottish parliament. This system is known as "parallelism", i.e. that each constituency should return two members, one of whom would be elected from a female list of candidates and one from a male list was preferred. All electors would vote for both. Other proposals were put forward, seeking to combine a parity principle with a proportional system.

Sources

OTHER SOURCES:

 

Additional reading

  • Campbell, R. & Childs, S. 2015. 'Conservatism, feminisation and the representation of women in UK politics'. Br Polit 10, 148–168
  • Lovenduski, J. 2005. ‘Party government and women’s representation debates: the UK’, in Lovenduski, J. et al (eds) State Feminism and Political Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 216-238.
  • Childs, S. 2004. New Labour’s Women MP’s: Women Representing Women, London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Squires, J. 2004. ‘Gender Quotas in Britain: A Fast Track to Equality?’, The Research Program on Gender Quotas. Working Paper Series 2004: 1. Stockholm University, Department of Political Science.
  • Childs, S. 2002. ‘Concepts of Representation and the Passage of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 8, 3: 90–108.
  • Russell, M., Mackay, F. and McAllister, L. 2002. ‘Women’s Representation in the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales: Party Dynamics for Achieving Critical Mass’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 8, 2: 49–76.
  • Norris, P. 2001. ‘ Breaking the Barriers: Positive Discrimination Policies for Women’. Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States.  Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maie (eds.). New York: Palgrave.
  • Squires, J. & Wickham-Jones, M. 2001. Women in Parliament: A Comparative Analysis. Equal Opportunities Commission.
  • Breitenbach, E. & Mackay, F. (eds). 2001. Women and Contemporary Scottish Politics: An Anthology. Edinburgh: Polygon.
  • Russell, M. 2000. Women’s Representation in UK Politics: What can be done with the
    Law?, London: The Constitution Unit.
  • Siim, B. 2000. Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Britain, and Denmark. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perrigo, S. 1999. ‘Women, Gender and New Labour.’ Gerald R. Taylor (ed.) The Impact of New Labour. New York: St. Martin’s Press. pp. 162-176.
    Short, C. 1996. ‘Women and the Labour Party.’ Parliamentary Affairs.  49, no. 1. pp. 17-25.
  • Henig, S. 1999. ‘The Labour Party and Women’s Quotas.’ Paper presented at the EPOP Conference.
  • McAllister, I. & Studlar, D.T., 1998. ‘Candidate gender and voting in the 1997 British General Election: Did Labour Quotas Matter?’ Journal of Legislative Studies 4, no. 3. pp. 72-91.
  • Eagle, M. & Lovenduski, J., 1998. ‘High Time of High Tide for Labour Women?’ Fabian Society Pamphlet. London: Fabian Society.
  • Anderson, J., 1997. Women as Electable Candidates: British Party Seeks Another Avenue to Affirmative Action. Parliamentarian. 78 (1) pp. 26-28
  • Perrigo, S., 1996. ‘Women and Change in the Labour Party 1979-1995.’ Parliamentary Affairs 49, no. 1. pp. 116-129.
  • Lovenduski, J. 1996. ‘The Compatibility of Parity Democracy with the Constitutional and Electoral Law of the United Kingdom.’  Group of Specialists on Equality and Democracy: Final Report of Activities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press. pp. 68-90.
  • Short, C. 1996. ‘Women and the Labour Party’, Parliamentary Affairs, 49, 1: 17–25.
  • Lovenduski, J. & Norris, P., (eds.) 1996. Women in Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Squires, J. 1996. ‘Quotas for Women: Fair Representation?’ in J. Lovenduski and P. Norris (eds) Women in Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–90.
  • Hoecker, B. 1996. Innerparteiliche Frauenförderung in Grossbritannien und Deutschland. Zeitschrift fur Parlamentsfragen 27(4) pp. 642-657.
  • Norris, P. & Lovenduski, J., 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mowlan, M. 1993. ‘Redressing the Imbalance: Labour Party Proposals to Ensure Greater Access for Women to Parliamentary Seats at Westminster.’ Parliamentarian 74, no. 4. pp. 196-197.
  • Brooks, R., Eagle A. & Short, C. 1990. Quotas Now: Women in the Labour Party. Fabian Tract 541. London: Fabian Society.
  • Vallance, E. 1984. ‘Women Candidates in the 1983 General Election’, Parliamentary
    Affairs, 37, 3: 301–9.
  • United Kingdom Parliament website, http://www.parliament.uk/

Additional reading

Europe | Global

Know about useful additional reading for United Kingdom? Tell us!

Comments

 

Do you have news concerning gender quotas for promoting
the equal participation and representation of women and men?
Please send them to us so that we can keep the information on this site up to date.

 

Contact Us

Disclaimer: Maps presented do not imply on the part of the Institute any judgement on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of such boundaries, nor does the placement or size of any country or territory reflect the political view of International IDEA. Maps are used in order to add visual clarity to data.