Flexibility, learning and ownership: new trends in democracy assistance, results management and evaluation

This publication is only available in electronic format
Published: 
31 December 2016
Language: 
English
Pages: 
50
Author(s): 
Helena Bjuremalm, William Sjöstedt

Results management approaches can play useful roles in making democracy assistance projects more effective and enhancing their impact.

Robust and relevant approaches to planning, implementation and monitoring of projects, and feeding back learning, have proved useful for achieving and assessing results in democracy assistance.

During the last two decades the policy and practice of results management has leaned towards emphasizing control and upward accountability. In recent years, however, a small but growing body of policymakers and practitioners in democracy assistance have initiated innovative efforts in results management, allowing for more learning and local ownership. Some of these initiatives use sense-making sessions to transform individual learning into institutional learning; most are open to adapt implementation to changing (political) contexts and place ownership firmly with partners to safeguard their space for learning.

This Discussion Paper argues that results management practice in democracy assistance work needs to be done differently to get at the main goal: making democracy assistance more relevant and effective and enabling larger impact. The arguments made in the paper come from a series of conversations that took place among democracy assistance practitioners between 2014 and 2016. They reflect engagement with emerging debates and signs of shifting policies and practices in development cooperation more generally.

Contents

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations

Preface

Executive Summary

1. Introduction

2. Past and current debates on results management in international development cooperation

3. The state of results management and the nature of democracy assistance

4. Emerging innovative practices in results management and evaluation of democracy assistance

5. Conclusions and recommendations

Policy and practice recommendations

References

About the authors

More International IDEA Discussion Papers

Related Content

Apr
26
2017
Panel de debate en el Foro Económico Mundial sobre América Latina 2017 en Argentina. Crédito foto: Foro Económico Mundial

Panel de debate en el Foro Económico Mundial sobre América Latina 2017 en Argentina. Crédito foto: Foro Económico Mundial

News Article
Apr
13
2017
International IDEA’s Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Director, Daniel Zovatto, seated (center) among panelists of the "Fighting corruption: The new way forward session" at the World Economic Forum in Argentina.

International IDEA’s Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Director, Daniel Zovatto, seated (center) among panelists of the "Fighting corruption: The new way forward session" at the World Economic Forum in Argentina. Zovatto shared the floor with Eber Betanzos Torres, Undersecretary for Public Administration of Mexico; Alejandro Guerrero, Corporate Country Officer, MMC Argentina; Juan Carlos Botero, Executive Director, The World Justice Project; and Alberto Bello, Editorial Director, Expansion Editorial Group. Photo credit: World Economic Forum

News Article
Mar
22
2017
Yves Leterme at the UN Office in Geneva

Yves Leterme at the UN Office in Geneva.

News Article
Mar
20
2017
Members and staff of the Joint Public Accounts Committee of the Myanmar Parliament

Members and staff of the Joint Public Accounts Committee of the Myanmar Parliament who participated at the democratic accountability workshop.

News Article