Sitting trust at the table of negotiations in Nepal
The signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2006 and Nepal’s
Constituent Assembly (CA) elections two years later ended a decade
of Maoist insurgency and civil war, popular protest and constitutional
stalemate. The resulting popularly elected 601-member Constituent
Assembly formed in 2008 comprised 33 per cent women, 8 per cent Dalit
(up from 0), and the Maoist party becoming the biggest party in the legislature
and the Constituent Assembly. The first meeting of the CA also ended the
centuries old monarchy and declared Nepal a republic.
Through the provision of a non partisan platform for dialogue, International
IDEA has been supporting Nepal since 2006, working with political parties
and civil society to design and to elect the Constituent Assembly and build the
new constitution. In facilitating the dialogues, IDEA has been pushing for a
Constituent Assembly and a constitution that is gender inclusive and supports
the rights of minorities and ethnic groups, and provided its published works that
contain comparative experiences from other countries around the world.
Given the fractures within Nepalese society these processes have not always gone
smoothly – underlining the need to build mutual trust before any consensus
can be formed. For example, although the agenda about rights, inclusion, selfdetermination,
accountability and responsiveness is, by and large, shared by the
political parties at the level of election manifestos and submissions, a degree of
elite resistance still exists. The question remains whether the party elites are able
and visionary enough to draft and agree on a constitution which realises these
goals, even if this goes against their immediate interests.
Once the CA began its work, it formed various
thematic committees that were charged with
preparing preliminary drafts and concept papers
for the new constitution. These committees
consulted many different organizations and
individuals, and sought the opinions of people
from all districts including Nepalese living
abroad. Studies and research carried out by
various national and international institutions
were also taken into account, together with the
views from political parties, experts, civil society
bodies, professional organizations and others.
Public consultations are planned to be held on
the first draft constitution as well.
At the CA’s bidding, International IDEA and
the Nepal Law Society put together an expert
team to analyze and prepare commentaries on
the draft concept papers and preliminary drafts
of the constitution from a legal perspective. The
political issues on the other hand were reviewed
by a team – consisting of members of the
Constituent Assembly – representing the different
political parties. The resulting commentaries
provided suggestions, and identified and analyzed
outstanding issues and concerns arising from the
texts for consideration by the Assembly.
Although the original timetable envisaged for the
new constitution to be promulgated was May 2010,
the process at the time of writing has been delayed
for a further year due to a number of political
differences that are presently being resolved.
“As a chair of this committee, I feel myself responsible
for making every person participate in the process of
constitution building. Linking public consultation
and public ownership is a very good idea. Certainly
this gives us a long-lasting and democratic
constitution. IDEA’s view is similar to ours … our
objectives complement each other.”
Pramod Gupta, Chair, Public Opinion Collection and Coordination Committee, Nepal